Impact of Social Media Use Interventions on Mental Well-Being: A Systematic Review

In today’s digital age, social media’s influence on mental health is a topic of increasing concern and interest. A recent systematic review conducted by researchers at University College London has shed light on the effectiveness of various interventions aimed at improving mental well-being through the management of social media use. Out of nearly 2,800 studies, only 23 met the criteria for inclusion in this review, underscoring the complexity and variability of the evidence in this field.

Quick Conclusions

The review found some promising evidence that social media use interventions can positively impact mental health, particularly in reducing depression. Therapy-based interventions, such as those utilizing cognitive-behavioral techniques, showed notable effectiveness. However, the review also highlighted the need for further research to identify which populations might benefit the most from these interventions. One key takeaway is that simply reducing social media use without addressing underlying issues may not be as beneficial for mental well-being.

Background: The Dual Nature of Social Media

Social media’s impact on mental health is multifaceted, with both positive and negative aspects. On one hand, social media platforms can enhance social support, strengthen relationships, and provide avenues for help-seeking. For instance, studies have shown that active use of social network sites can alleviate loneliness through increased social support (Lin et al., 2020) and that online connections can be as meaningful as face-to-face interactions (Grieve et al., 2013).

Conversely, social media is also linked to adverse mental health outcomes, including depression, anxiety, and distress, especially among younger populations (Keles et al., 2019; Royal Society for Public Health, 2023). When social media use disrupts daily life, it can become problematic, often referred to as ‘social media addiction’ (Henzel & Håkansson, 2021; Cheng et al., 2021).

Social Media Use Interventions

The review analyzed various interventions aimed at improving mental well-being through social media management, including:

• Therapy-Based Approaches: These interventions often incorporate therapeutic techniques such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), where individuals reflect on their social media use and its impact on their offline relationships (Chen et al., 2022).
• Digital Detoxes: Some studies explored the effects of complete breaks from social media or smartphone use. The results were mixed, with some studies showing benefits while others did not (Radtke et al., 2021).
• Limiting Social Media Use: Interventions that focused on reducing social media usage rather than complete abstinence were also reviewed. The findings varied widely, with some studies showing positive effects and others showing little to no impact.

Mental Well-Being Outcomes and Effectiveness

The review highlighted several key outcomes from the interventions:

• Depression: This was the most significantly improved outcome, with 70% of studies reporting benefits from interventions.
• Anxiety: Improved in 50% of the studies.
• FOMO (Fear of Missing Out): Improved in 50% of the studies, with no significant gender differences observed (Brown & Kuss, 2020).
• Mental Well-Being: Improved in 38% of studies.
• Self-Esteem: Improved in 33% of studies.

Mixed results were observed for:

• Loneliness: Reduced in 40% of studies, but one study found it increased.
• Mindfulness: Improved in one study but reduced in another.

Effectiveness by Intervention Type

• Therapy-Based Interventions: These proved to be the most effective, with 83% of studies showing significant improvements in mental well-being.
• Full-Abstinence Interventions: Showed mixed results, with 42% of studies reporting varying outcomes.
• Limited Social Media Use Interventions: Over half of the studies showed no effect, while 20% showed improvement and 20% had mixed results.

Summary of Findings

The systematic review underscores that therapy-based interventions are generally more effective than interventions that simply restrict social media use or impose full abstinence. Therapy-based methods appear to facilitate behavior change by replacing negative actions with structured goals and offering motivation. They also help reduce FOMO by encouraging individuals to reassess their priorities and engage in alternative activities.

Health care professionals, mental health charities, and public health bodies are advised to promote therapy-based approaches for managing social media use rather than focusing solely on reducing time spent online. Previous research suggests that limiting social media use without addressing underlying issues can sometimes reduce overall mental well-being by causing a loss of valuable social connections.

In conclusion, while social media interventions hold promise, it is clear that a nuanced approach is required. Therapy-based methods offer the most robust evidence for improving mental health outcomes, while simplistic measures like reducing screen time may not always be effective or beneficial.

References:

• Lin, S., Liu, D., Niu, G., & Longobardi, C. (2020). Active social network sites use and loneliness: the mediating role of social support and self-esteem. Current Psychology, 41(3), 1279–1286. doi: 10.1007/s12144-020-00658-8.
• Grieve, R., Indian, M., Witteveen, K., Anne Tolan, G., & Marrington, J. (2013). Face-to-face or Facebook: can social connectedness be derived online? Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 604–609. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.017.
• Keles, B., McCrae, N., & Grealish, A. (2019). A systematic review: the influence of social media on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 79–93. doi: 10.1080/02673843.2019.1590851.
• Royal Society for Public Health. (2023). #StatusOfMind Social media and young people’s mental health and wellbeing. Retrieved from https://www.rsph.org.uk/our-work/campaigns/status-of-mind.html.
• Henzel, V., & Håkansson, A. (2021). Hooked on virtual social life: Problematic social media use and associations with mental distress and addictive disorders. PLoS One, 16(4), e0248406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248406.
• Cheng, C., Lau, Y.C., Chan, L., & Luk, J.W. (2021). Prevalence of social media addiction across 32 nations: meta-analysis with subgroup analysis of classification schemes and cultural values. Addictive Behaviors, 117, 106845. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106845.
• Zhang, X., Shi, X., Xu, S., Qiu, J., Turel, O., & He, Q. (2020). The effect of solution-focused group counseling intervention on college students’ internet addiction: a pilot study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2519. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072519.
• Dogan, H., Norman, H., Alrobai, A., Jiang, N., Nordin, N., & Adnan, A. (2019). A web-based intervention for social media addiction disorder management in higher education: quantitative survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(10), e14834. doi: 10.2196/14834.
• Hiniker, A., Hong, S.R., Kohno, T., & Kientz, J.A. (2016). MyTime: designing and evaluating an intervention for smartphone non-use. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’16, 4746–4757. doi: 10.1145/2858036.2858403.
• Radtke, T., Apel, T., Schenkel, K., Keller, J., & von Lindern, E. (2021). Digital detox: an effective solution in the smartphone era? A systematic literature review. Mobile Media & Communication, 10(2), 190–215. doi: 10.1177/20501579211028647.
• Brown, L., & Kuss, D.J. (2020). Fear of missing out, mental wellbeing, and social connectedness: a seven-day social media abstinence trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(12), 4566. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124566.
• Chen, Y., Liu, X., Chiu, D.T., Li, Y., Mi, B., Zhang, Y., Ma, L., & Yan, H. (2022). Problematic social media use and depressive outcomes among college students in China: observational and experimental findings. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 4937. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19094937.
• Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L.
• Chand, S.P., Kuckel, D.P., & Huecker, M.R. (2022). Cognitive Behavior Therapy. StatPearls Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470241/.